MERRIMACK CHARTER COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 2005
Commission members
present: Chairman Tom Mahon, Vice
Chairman Heather Anderson, Secretary Fran L’Heureux, Peter Batula, Bob Kelley,
Finlay Rothhaus, Tim Tenhave, Lon Woods, and David Yakuboff.
Chairman Mahon convened the
meeting of the Charter Commission at 7:04pm in the Conference Room of the Town
Hall by welcoming the members of the public in attendance and by having the
Commissioners introduce themselves.
Public Comment Protocol
Chairman Mahon went on to explain
that tonight’s public hearing was prescribed by RSA 49-B:4, V and was a
requirement of the law. He further
described the process adopted by the Commission for public participation and
proper record keeping, which includes providing your name and residence for
those speaking.
Announcements
Chairman Mahon announced
that he has confirmed the attendance of two seasoned municipal managers for the
Commission’s August 2, 2005 meeting.
Scheduled to be in attendance at that meeting is former Merrimack Town
Manager Jim McSweeney and current Epping Town Administrator Steve Fournier.
Overview of the Charter Process and Forms of
Government
Chairman Mahon conducted a
PowerPoint presentation regarding NH RSA 49-B (the Charter process) and the
various forms of government a NH municipality permitted under NH RSA 49-C and
D. The presentation was
approximately 15 minutes long.
Public Comment
Chairman
Mahon opened the public hearing at 7:25pm.
v
Andrew Sylvia, 28
Merrymeeting Drive, asked if the town would have geographically defined wards
and questioned RSA 49-C, Section 9 (Qualifications for Office).
v
William Herbert, 23 Old
Kings Road, hoped that the Commission recommends a form of government that
represents all the people and not just a small group.
v
Carolyn Whitlock, 239
Baboosic Lake Road, hoped that the Commission would consider what part of the
present form of government is not working, and after identifying it, to see if
the problems will be fixed by the new form recommended by the Commission. (Chairman Mahon advised that by statute,
the Commission is required to give the public the reasoning behind their
decision.)
v
Dennis King, 10 Derry
Street, would like the Commission to consider doing away with SB2 and spoke in
favor of returning to the traditional town meeting format using advanced
technology to connect various locations.
v
William Herbert spoke
again citing this year’s warrant article for Horse Hill Nature Preserve and how
he felt a small minority of voters in attendance at the Deliberative Session changed
the petitioner’s original intent for the article. He stated that this wasn’t the first such example of a
warrant article’s intent being changed at the Deliberative Session and recalled
the first year that same property was on the Warrant and it was moved to
purchase the land for $1.
v
Ron Legere, 7 Dahl
Road, agreed with Dennis King to remove SB2; however questioned whether the
community was too large for the traditional town meeting format again.
v
Janice Chaussee, 3
Parker Drive, stated that she had just relocated from Nashville and was very
thankful for tonight’s overview presentation. She questioned which form of government costs more to
operate. (Vice Chairman Anderson
responded that much of the operational costs depend on the level of service the
community puts into place. She
also noted that approximately 10 years ago, the Town of Derry undertaking a
charter discussion discovered that it was less expensive to operate as a town
than a city due to the distribution formulas for state aid. However, much of that may have changed
with the statewide property tax and ongoing education funding allocations.)
v
Andrew Sylvia spoke
again stating that SB2 was passed in 1995 and the present Board of Selectmen
has no one in Thornton’s Ferry to represent them.
Before
closing the public hearing, Chairman Mahon asked if the reporters in attendance
had any questions.
Dan McLean from the Union
Leader asked if there are any state laws or guidelines for salaries for elected
officials. Chairman Mahon explained
that it is currently done through the budget process and there is typically a
small stipend for elected officials.
Close Public Comment
Chairman
Mahon closed the public hearing at 8:06pm and thanked those in attendance for
coming. He reminded the public of the next scheduled public
hearing on November 8. He also
reiterated the scheduling of public comment periods at the start and end of
each meeting. Vice Chairman
Anderson directed those who were interested to view the Commission’s web site
and to subscribe to the information list service.
Chairman Mahon recessed the meeting for approximately ten
minutes.
Recess for Subcommittee
Meetings
Chairman
Mahon noted that the subcommittee reviewing the current form of town government
would be meeting following this full Commission meeting. Therefore, there was no recess for
subcommittee meetings.
Other Business
Chairman Mahon reported that
he had distributed information he received from Allen Kranz, Chairman of the Dover
Charter Commission, which included their operating rules and regulations, their
timeline, their preliminary report recommending motion, and their preliminary
report for submission to the Secretary of State, Department of Revenue
Administration, and the Attorney General’s Office. Chairman Mahon noted that the Dover Commission had adopted
very similar rules and regulations.
He further mentioned that they required all motions to be in writing and
that they required six votes for any recommendations to go forward to the
ballot or to the attorney for review.
Chairman Mahon asked the Commission members to consider adding these
additional items to our rules of procedure.
Chairman Mahon reported that
he had sent out letters inquiring of interest to seven local municipal attorneys:
Timothy Bates, Esq. –
Laconia, NH
William Drescher, Esq. –
Milford, NH
Allen Krans, Esq. – Dover,
NH
Peter Loughlin, Esq. –
Portsmouth, NH
John Rattigan, Esq. – Exeter,
NH
Charles Tucker, Esq. –
Exeter, NH
Eugene Van Loan III, Esq. –
Manchester, NH
Chairman Mahon then asked
Commission members to give consideration to the possibility of having another public
hearing in September to allow public comment on the choice the Commission makes
regarding whether to recommend adopting a charter or maintaining the current
form of government.
A motion was made by Tim
Tenhave to schedule a public hearing on September 13, 2005. Heather Anderson seconded the motion
for discussion purposes. David
Yakuboff stated he thought the Commission should hold a public hearing before
September 13. The motion carried
8-1-0 (David Yakuboff voting in the negative).
There was a lengthy
discussion on the outreach program dealing with other boards and organizations. Chairman Mahon assured the Commission
members that his intent was to inform various constituencies and not advocate
for any particular direction.
Chairman Mahon also stated that other members of the Commission were
encouraged to accompany him to these meetings.
Tim Tenhave is developing a
format for the subcommittees to use for their reports, so that there will
uniformity.
Vice Chairman Anderson
explained that the website is current with material that has been sent to her
for posting. She reported that
anyone subscribing to the Information Service will now be directed upon submit
to a page that explains the service and what emails to expect as a result of
the individual’s subscription selections.
Minutes
A motion was made by Lon
Woods and seconded by Bob Kelley to accept the minutes of July 19, 2006 as
printed. The motion carried 9-0-0.
A motion to adjourn was made
by Lon Woods and seconded by Fran L’Heureux. The motion carried 9-0-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:03pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Secretary Fran L’Heureux